RSS
 

Next year’s TCM Film Festival: Movie recommendations

14 May

(Continuing Reveal Shot’s review of the 2013 TCM Film Festival.)

The fourth annual TCM Film Festival was the first I’d attended, and I certainly plan to attend in 2014.

Here are some movies I’d like to see:

[It's really unfortunate that Grauman's Chinese Theater won't be available for any of the following, because that is the ideal venue. I would hope that the Cinerama Dome could be utilized for some of the widescreen films.]

“Mystery Of The Wax Museum” (Warner Bros., 1933)

The 3-D remake of this film, ‘House Of Wax” (1953) would certainly be a big draw at the festival after the popular screenings of 3-D classics “Hondo” and “Dial M For Murder” this year, but I prefer the original. Lionel Atwill stars as the wax museum sculptor disfigured in a fire who goes insane and begins to tomb living women in wax. Glenda Farrell is the archetypal wisecracking female reporter who uncovers the horrific facts. See Will McKinley’s review of Film Forum’s 1933 Pre-Code Festival, which included this movie, at this link.

The Big Country” (United Artists, 1958)

This mammoth Western, directed by William Wyler, was brilliantly shot in Technirama by Franz Planer. The wide-open expanses and the scale of the feud between the Terrills, headed by Maj. Henry Terrill (Charles Bickford), and the Hannesseys, led by Rufus Hannessey (Burl Ives) would be amazing to see in the proper size. There’s a scene when Terrill’s men, accompanied by a thundering Jerome Moross score, ride to the Hannessey ranch, bent on revenge; makes me smile to think about it.

“The Great Race” (Warner Bros., 1965)

A perfect follow-up, at the Cinerama Dome, to this year’s presentation of “Mad Mad World.” I always assumed Blake Edwards was specifically trying to top that film, given the huge cast headlined by Tony Curtis, Natalie Wood, Jack Lemmon, Dorothy Provine (one of the stars of Stanley Kramer‘s epic), Peter Falk (ditto), Ross Martin and so many more.

“The Fall Of The Roman Empire” (Samuel Bronston/Paramount 1964)
Having seen a just-okay print of Samuel Bronston’s “El Cid” (1961) several years ago at the Pacific Film Archive in Berkeley, Calif. several years ago, this is the other epic of his I always wanted to see on the big screen. It has well-staged sword fights, a chariot race, and a brilliantly demented performance by Christopher Plummer as the mad Roman emperor Commodus.

Alec Guinness also distinguishes himself as Marcus Aurelius, as does James Mason as Timonides. Charlton Heston was to have been the lead actor, working with Sophia Loren as he had in “El Cid.” But because the two did not get along, Heston bowed out of “Roman Empire,” and Stephen Boyd stepped in. The first time I saw the film, it was  striking to see Boyd as a good guy after he had been the evil Messala in “Ben-Hur.”

“The Guns Of Navarone” (Columbia, 1961)

No matter how many times I see this one, I’m usually compelled to watch whenever it’s on. I’ve never seen it in a theatrical setting, and I would be anxious to see how an audience reacts to its big action scenes and the mounting tension between Mallory (Gregory Peck) and Stavrou (Anthony Quinn), as well as that which develops between Mallory and Miller (David Niven).

“Exodus” (United Artists, 1960)

Otto Preminger is one of my favorite directors. It has been more than 25 years since I saw this epic, over two nights on a Detroit television station. I wanted to get it on DVD several years ago, but kept reading terrible things about the transfer. If a print exists in good condition somewhere, it would be great to see it uncut, with an audience.

A Shot In The Dark” (UA, 1964)

Since “The Pink Panther” (1963) was shown at the 2012 festival, this would be a logical follow-up. Considered by many to be the funniest film in the series, “A Shot In The Dark” follows Clouseau (Peter Sellers) as he tries to absolve a beautiful woman (Elke Sommer) of the murder of her husband. The nudist colony sequences didn’t make me laugh, but just about everything else did, and I’m sure it would seem even funnier with a crowd of fans.

And the Henry Mancini main title theme is my favorite of all the “Pink Panthers.”

“The Victors” (Columbia, 1963)

Always wanted to see this movie, about a group of American soldiers fighting their way across Europe, and the toll it takes on them even though they ostensibly winning their battles. George Peppard and George Hamilton worked together again a few years after “Home From The Hill.” Also starring Vince Edwards, Romy Schneider, Elke Sommer, Rosanna Schaffiano and Jeanne Moreau.

– David B. Wilkerson

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
 

‘Dial M For Murder’ — a sophisticated end to the TCM Film Festival

09 May

(Continuing Reveal Shot’s review of the 2013 TCM Film Festival concludes Day 4)

Of the two 3-D screenings at the festival, Alfred Hitchcock’sDial M For Murder” (1954) was the one I perceived to be a must. (The other, “Hondo” (1953) would have been a useful backup once it became obvious that I wasn’t going to get a good seat for “On The Waterfront” Friday night, but by then there were only about 15 minutes left until the John Wayne feature was set to begin.) It would be my last movie of the festival, on the evening of Day 4.

Leonard Maltin introduced the film with a very interesting talk about the use of 3-D in 1953 and ’54. He explained that the process worked just fine, but lost traction during 1953 because people didn’t like wearing the uncomfortable cardboard glasses. “But then Hollywood was thrown a curve late in 1953 when some films did well on 3-D, including ‘Hondo.’ …So they thought maybe we shouldn’t throw this technology away just yet.”

So it was that Warner Bros. opted to bring the Frederick Knott Broadway success “Dial M For Murder” to the screen in 3-D, with Hitchcock directing.

Maltin then interviewed the producer and actor Norman Lloyd, whose mind remains razor sharp at 98. Though Lloyd did not work with Hitchcock on “Dial M,” and never had a discussion with the director about the 3-D process, he did tell an entertaining story about Hitchcock’s “Saboteur” (1942). He described the filming of the shot in which Lloyd’s villainous character falls to his death from the Statue of Liberty. While Lloyd was in a saddle, flailing around like a falling man, a camera looking down at him was raised up to the ceiling of the studio, which on film looks as if he is falling away from the camera.

The print of “Dial M For Murder” at the festival looked quite sharp, especially for Warnercolor, that studio’s version of Eastmancolor, which has proven so problematic in restorations.

The use of 3-D in “Dial M” is modest but effective. From the opening credits, it looks as if the image is directly in front of your face. Hitchcock often seemed to have one of the characters and some piece of furniture in the foreground, while another character is in the background.

****SPOILER ALERT****

 

This was most striking, as one would expect, during the murder attempt on Margot Wendice (Grace Kelly), in which she ends up killing her attacker, Captain Lesgate (Anthony Dawson).

For most of its running time, though, “Dial M’s” 3-D effect does not call attention to itself, as the viewer tries to follow the labyrinth-like plot. It was intriguing to set up part of Tony Wendice’s motive as jealousy, since Margot has had an affair with the hack mystery writer Mark Halliday (Robert Cummings, in the only weak performance of the film). Sure, Tony (Ray Milland) is greedy, but he’s also irritated at being cuckolded by a clown like Halliday.

Tony’s fatal mistake of removing the key to the apartment from Lesgate’s pocket and placing it into Margot’s handbag  is entirely logical, and yet just as logically seen by Chief Inspector Hubbard (John Williams) as a problem that casts suspicion on Tony.

Milland is very good as the scheming Tony, and Grace Kelly, even with all of her beauty and charm, is credible as a woman with the strength to fight for her life — and the vulnerability to be hurt when she finds out that her husband wanted to kill her.

Williams, who had played the same role on stage, gives “Dial M’s” best performance as a man who knows what to look for and won’t back down from a hunch even when the case seems to be going against him.

The one aspect of the plot that seems too contrived is a moment that may have been intended by Knott to be funny.

It comes when Halliday proposes that Tony lie to the police and save Margot from execution by claiming to have hatched a murder scheme — one that happens to jibe almost precisely with the plan we’ve seen unfold for the last 90-odd minutes. There were several laughs at the Chinese Multiplex 1 during the scene.

Seeing “Dial M For Murder” made me want to see more of the better 3-D films of the period, perhaps at next year’s festival.

[Update: By the way, as part of Maltin's presentation, he pointed out that "Dial M" was initially released in 3-D, but generated weak ticket sales in that form during its first engagement in Philadelphia, so the exhibitor asked Warner Bros. for a traditional "flat" print that wouldn't require glasses. That version did very well, and that's the one most audiences saw in 1954. Warner Bros. did offer the film to theaters in 3-D, but most just said no thanks. It's too bad. The glasses we wore at the festival screening were the comfortable plastic kind handed out at 3-D movies made today.]

– David B. Wilkerson

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
 

Warner Bros. Gangster films of the 1930s: the Reveal Shot series Parts I-V

08 May

PUBLICEN31-maintitleSince Reveal Shot launched in January, some of the most popular posts have been from the series on the Warner Bros. gangster films of the 1930s.

Here are all five installments in the series, in order. Future posts will offer analyses of additional films in the genre that weren’t explored in detail during the series.

Part I: Gangster films of the 1930s and their many levels of fascination

Part II: Cagney, Robinson and the various guises of 1930s gangster thrillers

Part III: Warner Bros. calls for penal reform in “I Am A Fugitive From a Chain Gang

Part IV:  “Angels With Dirty Faces” helped Warner Bros. close out ’30s in style

Part V: “The Roaring Twenties”: Unforgettable action overshadows plot trouble in ’39 Warner Bros. saga

There was also a post, separate from the series, on Howard Hughes’ 1932 version of “Scarface.”

A call for gun control in the original “Scarface.”

– David B. Wilkerson

Enhanced by Zemanta
 

Warner Bros.’ George Feltenstein on Warner Archive

07 May

Shop.WarnerArchive.com ­5-13During the 2013 TCM Film Festival, Reveal Shot featured an interview with George Feltenstein, senior vice president of catalog marketing for Warner Bros. Digital Distribution, who discussed the studio’s painstaking restoration of “Giant” (1956), which screened on Day 2 of the festival.

Now, here is the second part of that interview. Feltenstein talks about the ongoing success of the Warner Archive.

Feltenstein founded the Archive in 2009. Though Sony had announced early in 2008 that it would bring some of its niche titles to DVD on a made-on-demand basis, the Warner Archive was first to market with the concept.  As Feltenstein explained to me in an interview at the time, there was a great deal of “pent-up demand” for many of the titles in Warner’s movie and TV library, the largest in the world.

The home video market seemed to be in full decline. The U.S. was still in the throes of the economic recession of 2008-09, and an increasing number of people seemed to prefer DVD rental to purchase. Retailers were returning many unsold discs to the studios, saying they could no longer justify the shelf space. Worse, important outlets like Tower Video and Virgin Megastore disappeared from the landscape.

However, Feltenstein noticed that a number of older titles had sold very well in the retail market over the previous year. He knew there were much-requested A-list films and TV shows that would generate solid sales if sold directly by the studio at WarnerArchive.com.

Initially, 150 films were made available, and the program was an immediate success. Today Warner Archive offers more than 1,500 titles, many of them either remastered or brought up to a standard of quality just below that of a full remastering.

Feltenstein said in the April 26 interview that it is gratifying to see other studios, including MGM and Fox, move ahead with their own on-demand disc offerings, because “imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.”

One of my favorite Warner Archive releases, “Don Juan” (1926), starring John Barrymore and Mary Astor, the first film with synchronized sound effects and music score.

“We would like to see every studio that has a large film library make their movies available as we have done. We make the caveat that we make sure that there is a significant level of quality improvement from what had been offered on television or VHS or whatever the case might have been.”

Other studios have stumbled, at times, in this regard. Fox has raised the ire of film buffs with its Fox Cinema Archives initiative, launched last year, which frequently issues movies shot in the CinemaScope widescreen format in so-called “pan-and-scan” versions, when anamorphic widescreen has been the accepted home video standard for many years.

In the pan-and-scan process, a telecine operator pans horizontally across the image to find the middle of the wide frame  to give viewers a sense of what’s happening on the screen. The result is a loss of about 30% of the picture.

Warner Archive has of course recently begun a streaming offering, an indication that Feltenstein isn’t concerned that the technology will cannibalize Blu-ray and DVD sales.

A fascinating Internet discussion last month focused on the concern of cinephiles Stephen Bowie and Stuart Galbraith IV that too many film buffs appear to be settling for streaming, when the superior Blu-ray experience has become quite affordable.

“I think streaming is additive, and complementary [to Blu-ray],” Feltenstein said. “For the consumer who wants to own a film, Blu-ray provides the opportunity to own a film at the highest possible quality. And having the ease and access of being able to watch content on several different devices is only a plus.

“The use of Blu-ray for catalog titles is a growing business,” Feltenstein went on, despite the ongoing weakness of the economy and the ascendance of streaming.

“.. It’s all about the right format and the right availability, and it’s a call to action for all of the studios to make sure their libraries are well-maintained so that the quality is sufficient to justify a Blu-ray presentation.”

– David B. Wilkerson

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
 

‘It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World’ — mission accomplished at TCM Film Festival

05 May
My shot of a poster for "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World" in the Cinerama Dome lobby, April 28, 2013.

My shot of a poster for “It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World” in the Cinerama Dome lobby, April 28, 2013.

(Reveal Shot‘s review of the 2013 TCM Film Festival continues with Day 4)

Whatever doubts I might have had about going to the festival this year were dissolved when I saw that “It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World” would be screened in a 50th anniversary, 70MM presentation at the Cinerama Dome, where it premiered on Nov. 7, 1963. If I could see it, the trip would be a success.

Like many others over 30, I fell in love with “Mad Mad World” during its marathon appearances on “The ABC Sunday Night Movie” in the ’70s, long before I could identify many of the actors on its gigantic cast list.

I bought it on VHS around 1992, and then on DVD. Fortuitously, as with “The Great Escape,” I hadn’t seen the whole thing for a while, trying to save it for a special occasion.

On Sunday, April 28, the final morning of the festival, I was tempted to see the restoration of “Badlands” (1973) at Grauman’s Chinese, but decided that to see “Mad Mad World” the way I had dreamed of for decades, I needed to be in line at the Dome by 10, even for a 12:15 screening, as there would surely be a full house. As I’ve mentioned in previous posts, members of the press did not get reserved seating.

After a while, Marvin Kaplan‘s limo arrived, and the bespectacled actor was helped into a wheelchair, wearing a plaid flat cap. About 10 minutes later, Mickey Rooney showed up, also in a chair, in far better shape than I had expected.

The Dome — built for the premiere of “Mad Mad World” 50 years ago –  has an odd circular interior. Some of the best seats are on an aisle in the center of the theater, and those were largely taken by the “Spotlight/VIP” passholders by the time my tier came in. Still, I managed to get a very good spot not many seats to the right, in a row near the middle.

There was then a fun interview with Kaplan, Rooney, Barrie Chase and Karen Sharpe Kramer, Stanley’s widow. Jonathan Winters was slated to appear, but died last month at the age of 87. Carl Reiner was also scheduled, but wasn’t feeling well and canceled just before the festival.

Marvin Kaplan on stage at "It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World" screening at the Cinerama Dome. (Photo Credit: Edward M. Pio Roda/TCM)

Marvin Kaplan on stage at “It’s A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World” screening at the Cinerama Dome. (Photo Credit: Edward M. Pio Roda/TCM)

Kaplan’s recollections were the most vivid, and got big laughs from the Dome audience. He explained that when Stanley Kramer explained to him that the character of Irwin, one of two gas station attendants, would get hit with tires, thrown through walls and experience other mayhem, he was worried. Then Kramer revealed that the work would be handled by stuntmen, and that Arnold Stang had agreed to play the part of the other attendant.  Kaplan said he felt it would probably be all right if Stang, “one of the biggest cowards” in show business at the time, was willing to participate.

However, Jonathan Winters threw a wrench into the works when he wanted to do a lot of the stunts himself, Kaplan said. “And it was very difficult to find a stunt double for Arnold Stang, because Arnold was very short and very thin,” the actor explained. They did find a double, but he was very muscular about the shoulders, so Stang had to be padded so that he could look like the stuntman.

“Arnold and I hoped Jonathan would get hurt,” Kaplan recalled. “Not badly hurt, just a little bit hurt.”

But Winters and Kaplan developed a great friendship on the set. The two men shared a trailer, when Kramer and the crew discovered that Kaplan could keep the zany ex-Marine under some kind of control. “I would say, ‘Who do you want to be today, Jonathan?’ Sometimes he would be a bear … another time he was the Great Indian Chief, and  he loved the white man.”

Rooney also said he recalled the filming of “Mad Mad World” with fondness, pointing out the “kindness” shown by Milton Berle and Jack Benny, among others. “There’s someone else I think we’re forgetting — Spencer Tracy,” the 92-year-old former child star pointed out.

Karen Sharpe Kramer repeated the story of Stanley Kramer’s fateful dinner with Bosley Crowther, the New York Times film critic, that led to the movie. Crowther told Kramer that as much as he and his colleagues admired the filmmaker, they had reached a consensus that he could “never, ever do a comedy.”

“Well, all you had to do is tell Stanley he couldn’t do something,” Karen Sharpe Kramer said. “He said ‘Oh, yeah?’ ”

She said the film, which premiered just two weeks before the assassination of John F. Kennedy, had much to do with the nation’s healing process over the course of its two-year initial run.

Barrie Chase seemed to have pleasant memories of doing her scenes with Dick Shawn, but when asked how much the movie did for her career, she admitted: “Not a whole lot.” For some reason my eyes were drawn to Karen Sharpe Kramer, who reacted with a polite shrug, as if to say “well, that’s showbiz,  folks.” Read the rest of this entry »

 

My 35-year wait to see ‘Island of Lost Souls’ comes to an end — the TCM Film Festival in review

04 May

(Reveal Shot‘s review of the 2013 TCM Film Festival continues with more from Day 3.)

When I was in the fourth grade, in 1978-79, I was in the Weekly Reader Book Club. One of the books I asked my mother to buy for me was “Movie Monsters,” by Thomas G. Aylesworth.

It was just a 79-page paperback with some basic facts about classic horror movies, largely focusing on the Universal cycle, but including many others, as well, including “Island of Lost Souls” (1932, Paramount). I was fascinated by the description of the film and the stills of Charles Laughton as the evil genius Dr. Moreau and Bela Lugosi as the Sayer Of The Law. I knew I had to see it.

For some reason, however, I could never catch “Lost Souls” on television. A couple of times I was channel surfing and came across it somewhere in the middle, and turned away immediately as I wanted to see it from the beginning. Later, horror movies became one of my lesser interests, as war films, other types of dramas and comedies moved to the forefront.

I did put the Criterion DVD release on my Amazon wish list last year, but hadn’t pulled the trigger on it. When I saw it would be screened at the TCM Film Festival, I penciled it in, figuring I would see it unless I was too exhausted for a midnight show on Day 3.

As it turned out, I took the only “break” I had during the festival that Saturday evening to have dinner with one of my best friends, a former co-worker, and was still fresh for the “Lost Souls” screening at the Chinese Multiplex.

There was a bigger crowd than I’d expected, a fun group that still had plenty of adrenaline after a long day.

TCM Underground programmer Millie DeChirico introduced the film with a few of her observations. “I love Charles Laughton. He’s creepy, he’s pervy … he’s so great in this movie,” she said.

DeChirico also singled out character actor Stanley Fields for praise. She said she admired his portrayal of a character with no redeeming features, who takes pleasure in getting drunk, punching shipwreck victim and hero Edward Parker (Richard Arlen) and tossing him overboard onto Moreau’s ship instead of taking him to a safe port, in a flagrant violation of maritime law.

Laughton was as good as advertised so long ago in “Movie Monsters,” I was happy to see. The performance seemed properly modulated; there were moments of bluster when the script and the emotional demands of a scene called for them, but when Moreau is laying out the intellectual framework for his experiments, and the results, Laughton displays the detachment of a scientist — one whose humanity has been warped, yes, but a scientist.

**** SPOILER ALERT ****

 

Also solid, in the supporting role of Montgomery, the disgraced doctor who helps Moreau carry out his experiments, was Arthur Hohl. When Montgomery finally turns on Moreau to help Parker and his fiancée (Leila Hyams) make their final escape from the island, it is believable because Hohl has conveyed enough of the character’s inner doubts and remorse from early on.

Arlen does what he can with Parker. He is competent, coming alive most notably when he angrily discovers that Moreau has created The Panther Woman, Lota (Kathleen Burke), who is fully equipped to arouse Parker’s sexual interest, but finally betrayed by her beast-like claws.

I was vaguely irritated by Lugosi, who pounds out a one-note performance as The Sayer Of The Law. I don’t know that I should have expected more; after all, the character isn’t exactly subtle. Still, I could feel myself frowning when he says one of the tenets of Moreau’s law (and, in the end, “There is no law.”).

I liked “Island Of Lost Souls.” It was a great way to end Day 3 and start Day 4. Its message that nature is nothing to trifle with remains relevant, and the Laughton performance alone makes it worth revisiting. And I now have more reason to see the extras on that Criterion disc.

– David B. Wilkerson

Enhanced by Zemanta
 

Stellar script, Elizabeth Taylor sustain ‘Giant’ — TCM Film Festival in review

03 May

(Reveal Shot’s review of the TCM Film Festival continues with Day 3 highlights.)

Thanks to the lesson I’d learned Friday night about making sure to get into line early enough for well-attended screenings, I abandoned my original plan to see “To Sir With Love” at noon on Saturday so I could get to Grauman’s Chinese by at least 12:45 to get set up for “Giant” (1956), appearing in a new restoration at 2 p.m.

I had wanted to see the silent World War I drama “The Big Parade” (1925) — also in a new restoration — but it was scheduled for 3 p.m. the same afternoon, so I had to decide between it and “Giant.” Though both movies are epic in scope, “Giant” somehow seemed like the film I would be more likely to regret having missed on the big screen. Given another couple of days to make up my mind, I might have gone with the King Vidor film.

The normal queuing area outside Grauman’s was still blocked off from Jane Fonda’s hand-and-footprint ceremony that morning, so passholders had to line up in the building next door that contains the TCL Chinese Multiplex. I had a queue number in the low 80s, enabling me to get set up in a section toward the middle of the theater, just about in the center of a row.

Before the movie, TCM’s Ben Mankiewicz interviewed Jane Withers, who played Vashti Snythe. Though she was escorted onto the stage in a wheelchair, Withers, who had just turned 87 earlier in the month, was in fine voice. She explained that director George Stevens had seen her during a hospital stay, and told her she would be perfect for the role as Leslie’s best friend. When Stevens later telephoned her to formally offer her the part, she hung up, convinced someone was playing a practical joke.

When she did take the part, and filming began, she befriended James Dean by dismissing all the fuss being made over the young actor. Withers told a spellbound audience about how, during one of the regular parties she hosted for cast and crew members, she came upon a reclining Dean, with cowboy hat tipped so that it covered his eyes. “I said ‘Jimmy, is that you?’ ‘Yep.’ ‘How did you get in here?’ He had come in through the window. I said ‘Why didn’t you come in through the front door like everybody else?’ He said, ‘I didn’t want to see any of them, I came to see you.’ I said, ‘Well, will you use the front door next time?’ ”

Withers, who still prides herself on being handy with tools, said she nailed the windows shut to make sure Dean couldn’t enter that way again.

She then shared another memory of Dean, one that, I will admit, put tears in my eyes. She has told the story before, but somehow I hadn’t heard it until last Saturday at Grauman’s.

Dean was very fond of a pink shirt, and wanted to wear it every day. Withers noticed that the shirt had started to stink; Dean said he didn’t want to send it to the laundry because he worried that it would be lost, as other shirts of his had been. So the actress agreed to wash his shirt each night, and he came by and picked it up every day.

Dean gave her the shirt for the last time on the night of Sept. 29, 1955. She washed it, but Dean didn’t pick it up the next morning. He was going to be in a car race on Sept. 30, and told her to hang on to the shirt, and it would still be fresh when he wanted to wear it the following day. Withers said he had asked her to come see him race many times, but she was always afraid that he drove too fast. “I had a terrible feeling” about Dean that day, she explained, and prayed for her friend’s safety. Dean was killed that afternoon, and Withers has held on to the pink shirt ever since.

Also during the interview, Withers said she’s tired of “the tacky things they do” in modern movies.

Like so many of the other movies I saw at the festival, “Giant” took on different dimensions for me in the company of an audience. The script, by Fred Guiol and Ivan Moffat from the mammoth Edna Ferber novel, seemed much wittier and funnier than I’d remembered.

Elizabeth Taylor as Leslie (Lynton) Benedict in “Giant” (1956).

While most of the critical acclaim among the actors seems to go to Dean, I think it is Elizabeth Taylor as the strong-willed Leslie (Lynton) Benedict who truly carries the picture. Leslie is the character who triggers just about every moment of growth for the rather dense Bick Benedict (Rock Hudson), from the early scenes in Maryland when he is courting her, until the final reel, when basic pride in his own blood stirs the middle-aged Texan to resist bigotry.

Taylor does it all here. She is by turns strident, sexy, funny, willful and sharp. When Leslie challenges Bick during their courtship by asking him if Texas was stolen from Mexico, she serves notice that she is no empty-headed beauty. When Bick’s ill-fated sister Luz tries to bully her into a secondary role, it doesn’t take long for Leslie to assert herself, and for an actress who was then only 23, Taylor shows a maturity that allows her to believably portray the strength in the woman. Taylor is supreme in a scene when Bick and his friends try to exclude Leslie from a discussion of politics. “Set up my spinning wheel, girls,” she says to the other wives in room, who have stayed in the background. “I’ll join the harem section in a minute.” Later in the same scene, she calls the men “cavemen,” saying they “ought to be wearing leopard skins and carrying clubs.”

When Bick is ready to continue the argument in the bedroom, Leslie defuses the situation, first with wit (“You knew what a dreadful girl I was when you married me. I did not deceive you, sir. From the first moment I couldn’t have been more unpleasant.”) and smoldering sexuality. “Come on, pardner,” she says, smiling. “Why don’t you kick off your spurs?” The whole scene had the Grauman’s audience laughing.

Taylor is somewhat hampered in her later scenes by makeup intended to make her look like a woman in her 50s, but after a few minutes the steely resolve in her Leslie overcomes the greasepaint. She should have received an Academy Award nomination for Best Actress.

It’s also easy to see why Jett Rink (Dean) is so mesmerized by Taylor’s Leslie, to the point of wanting to improve himself, and build an empire, all for a woman he knows he cannot have. Taylor and Dean are very good in a scene in which Leslie comes out to visit Dean on the plot of land left to him by the departed Luz. She offers no comment when she sees a picture of herself in her wedding dress that Jett has put up to “decorate” his house, and even compliments him on the terrible tea he has made. Taylor subtly indicates that she understands the man’s obsession, but doesn’t feel threatened by it.

Another standout is Chill Wills as Uncle Bawley, who dispenses various insights on the Benedicts’ plight throughout. Wills got several hearty laughs from the Grauman’s audience.  After Jett strikes oil and has a physical confrontation with Bick, Wills drawls, “Bick, you shoulda shot that fella a long time ago. Now he’s too rich to kill.”

As for Dean, I’ve always thought he did seem convincing as the middle-aged Jett; it helps that the character becomes a pathetic drunk, affording the actor a chance to play broadly — stumbling around, slurring his speech and finally tumbling headlong over a banquet table.

One of the key themes in the film is the way that Bick gradually learns that Mexicans are people, too — something his rival Jett never understands. I found myself wondering how much flak Stevens must have taken in 1956 for suggesting that women had a right to discuss politics and other matters on an equal basis with men, and that people shouldn’t be discriminated against on the basis of skin color. It’s a research project for a future post.

The restored print of “Giant” looked very good, considering the difficulty Warner Bros. faced in dealing with Eastmancolor, the color process used on so many feature films during the period. Many scenes looked quite sharp, while others seemed rather blurry; sometimes this variation could be spotted within the same scene.

George Feltenstein, senior VP of marketing for Warner Home Video’s classic catalog, discussed the obstacles involved in an interview with Reveal Shot last week.

– David B. Wilkerson

 Related articles

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
 

‘The Great Escape’ still impresses – the TCM Film Festival in review

01 May

(Reveal Shot‘s review of the TCM Film Festival continues with more from Day 2.)

After seeing “Ben-Hur” Friday morning at Grauman’s Chinese, I holed up in the newsroom that had been set up at the Roosevelt Hotel for the next few hours, doing an interview and writing my first blog post from the festival.

Just before 5 p.m., I realized I had better cross the street and get over to Grauman’s for “The Great Escape,” which was starting at 5:30. By the time I made my way through the line, the only seat I could find was about six rows from the screen.

At least that vantage point afforded a good view of producer Walter Mirisch, who was interviewed on the stage by TCM host Ben Mankiewicz. Mirisch, 91, was sharp and funny, recalling how he and director John Sturges initially discussed having Kirk Douglas and Burt Lancaster take the lead roles in “Escape,” having worked with them in “Gunfight At The O.K. Corral” (1957).

Asked what scuttled that idea, Mirisch was frank: “We thought about how much it was going to cost us to use Kirk and Burt.”

Mirisch then proposed using popular television actors Steve McQueen and James Garner. “Now, you do realize,” Mankiewicz exclaimed, “when you say that, that it makes you a genius?”

The audience was enthusiastic throughout the film, reminding me how much it relies on humor to sustain interest in the cat-and-mouse game between the POWs and their German captors for nearly three hours.

One of the biggest laughs came when Charles Bronson, as Danny “The Tunnel King” is taking a shower to camouflage one of the tunnels. When a German guard asks him what he’s doing, Bronson merely points to the shower head with his thumb and says, “Shower. I need a VASH.” Then the guard looks at Sedgwick (James Coburn), and makes the same inquiry. “I’m watching him,” he replies, bringing more guffaws from the Grauman’s crowd.

**** SPOILER ALERT ****

 

Sturges and screenwriters James Clavell and W.R. Burnett, who adapted Paul Brickhill’s book, do a masterful job of keeping the tension high.

I hadn’t seen “Escape” about 20 years, so I had forgotten that early in the film the Gestapo, have targeted Bartlett (Richard Attenborough), the leader of escape operations, threatening to shoot him on sight if he is caught trying to escape once again. It was a moment that made me wish I was seeing the movie for the first time, without the knowledge of what happens to Bartlett and 49 others who are captured in the final reel.

Garner, as the American “scrounger” Hendley, takes the acting honors amid a stellar cast, in my view, partly because the character is so suited to the Garner persona so familiar from “Maverick.” Hendley is vital to the escape effort from the beginning, finding tools, materials and other things the men will need. He has memorable scenes with both Blythe “the Forger” (Donald Pleasance) and the beleaguered German guard Werner (Robert Graf) that hit just the right note.

Attenborough is also very good, along with Gordon Jackson as MacDonald, the chief of intelligence.

Of course, McQueen stands out, doing a lot with a character that stands outside of the central plan until the movie is half over. His Hilts establishes a rapport with the nearly stir-crazy Ives “the Mole” (Angus Lennie) that pays off in Ives’ death scene. The demise of his best friend in the camp finally persuades Hilts to go along with Bartlett’s scheme.

I’m glad I saw “The Great Escape” on the big screen, despite my seat. As much as I always liked it, it really comes alive with an audience.

– David B. Wilkerson

Enhanced by Zemanta
 

‘Ben-Hur’ at the TCM Film Festival: The way it should be

29 Apr

benhur59-1As things turned out, “Ben-Hur” (1959) was my introduction to the TCM Film Festival, and I can’t imagine one that would have been better.

First, it must be said that the 8K digital restoration of the film Warner Bros. completed two years ago looked magnificent on the Grauman’s Chinese Theater screen. It was the best-looking print I saw during the festival, and the best example I’ve seen of digital projection. To my eyes, it looked crystal clear.

As always, there were a few surprises, things that differed from my general memory of previous viewings.

When I saw the movie at the UC Theater in 1999, I remember thinking that Messala’s (Stephen Boyd) love for Judah Ben-Hur (Charlton Heston), his oldest and dearest friend1, turns into vicious hatred too abruptly. The man gets into Judea, has one conversation with his buddy, and all of a sudden he’s making a “you’re with me or against me” ultimatum.

Seeing the early sequences again, I realized that it doesn’t happen quite that fast. It clearly happens over at least a few days. At one point the two men seem to have reached some level of agreement. But Messala’s willingness to put Judah in such a difficult position makes it clear that the power and prestige of Roman military service turned him against his friend years earlier.

Wyler handles this shrewdly; he doesn’t spend a huge amount of time establishing the scenario, but just enough to let us see how thoroughly corrupt the man is. He also toys with the affections of Judah’s sister, Tirzah (Cathy O’Donnell), which I had forgotten, probably because again, Wyler doesn’t devote lots of screen time to it (and because Messala later tosses Tirzah and the Hur matriarch, Miriam (Martha Scott), into the dungeons on a trumped-up charge, which sets the plot into motion).

Movieprop from the movie Ben Hur at the Nation...

Movie prop from “Ben-Hur” at the National Museum of Ship Models and Sea History, Sadorus, Ill.

Seeing the film with a crowd of film buffs makes a difference.  During the sea battle, which culminates in Judah saving Quintus Arrius’ life and setting up the second half of the movie, it’s quite obvious that model ships are being used, as are the rear projection shots during close-ups. Catch a sequence like that with an audience of bored college students and you might hear laughter, or catcalls. The TCM crowd didn’t clap, as these fans do for scenes that really impress them, but everyone just watched, understanding the context, taking it on its own terms. And a sarcastic line Judah delivers before he an d Arrius are rescued got a nice laugh, as intended.

The chariot race always delivers the goods, especially when anybody gets run over. The TCM audience cheered and whooped when Messala got dragged and trampled.

” ‘Ben-Hur’ is a commitment,’ I overheard one fan saying at a later screening. ‘It’s really long, and after the chariot race…’ ” I couldn’t hear the rest, but I can guess.  One thing I wanted to see was whether I felt any better about “Ben-Hur” once the film goes into its final stretch, which has always felt anticlimactic.

I tried to pay more attention to Judah’s transition from being consumed by hate for Messala and all things Rome, to peace and contentment with Esther (Haya Harareet) and a conversion to early Christianity. Despite my lukewarm feelings about this part of the movie, I always just figured that the primary problem was Gen. Lew Wallace’s 1880 book, which left his hero with nothing exciting to do after he defeats his enemy.

I can’t say I was moved by the miracle that cures the Hur women of leprosy, but the thunderstorm that hits after Jesus is crucified and Miklós Rózsa‘s score assure that the film retains a grand, epic dimension. Ultimately you do get the sense of a long journey, for Judah and his family, which to me is the point of a film that’s nearly four hours long.

This brings to mind another thing about Friday’s screening — the sound. Hearing the way “Ben-Hur” sounded at Grauman’s Chinese truly helped recreate the sense of having seen the film when it played its initial roadshow engagements. It’s no wonder that one of the 11 Oscars it received was for Best Sound (Franklyn Milton).

From the Overture until the end, Rózsa’s music (another Oscar winner) buoys the film. He gave most of the main characters their own themes, and he has some comment to make on just about everything except the chariot race. Undoubtedly the approach will seem overbearing to many modern viewers, but for people who enjoy the music score conventions of Golden Age Hollywood films, it’s pretty hard to top this one.

I’m particularly glad to have seen “Ben-Hur” at Grauman’s while I could, given the recent news that Imax is going to remodel it.

 

[Addendum 5-19:  Here is a thoughtful 2009 appraisal of the film by the New York Times' A.O. Scott.]

– David B. Wilkerson

Enhanced by Zemanta
 

Lessons learned at the 2013 TCM Film Festival through Day 2

27 Apr

TCM13-logoLOS ANGELES — After a long but satisfying Day 2 at the TCM Film Festival here, I’ve reached a number of conclusions.

1) Member of the press or not, you’d better get in line very early for movies that look like they’ll be well attended, especially if they’re not in the morning.

Those with media passes are included within a broader category for admission purposes, with a few of the festival pass tiers, so all depends on when you get into line.

When I arrived at 9 a.m. for the 9:30 screening of “Ben-Hur” at Grauman’s Chinese Theater, I was able to get a great seat about midway between the front and back of the venue, in a seat near the middle of a row.

When I got to the 5:30 screening of “The Great Escape” at about 10 after, again at Grauman’s, I had to settle for a seat only five or six rows from the screen. I still enjoyed the film, for sure, but even a 4k digital restoration, projected digitally, doesn’t look quite right from that close. It’s possible to see a sort of video “noise” on the screen at that distance.

I was writing the previous entry that afternoon. I probably should have stopped writing by at least 4:15, and headed over to Grauman’s to get in line for “Escape.”

2) Because of #1, “tight squeezes” between one film and another are impractical.

For today’s screenings, I entertained a notion of going to see “To Sir With Love” at noon (at the Chinese Multiplex 6) and somehow getting over to “Giant” for a 2:00 show at the original Grauman’s. Hilarious. That line is going to be so long that my current plan is to be online at 12:30 — 12:45 at the latest.

After “The Great Escape” ended, it was nearly 9. When I saw the huge line for “On the Waterfront,” which stretched out for a block or two down Hollywood Blvd., I knew there was no way I could get anything like a desirable seat. Moreover, “Hondo” was starting at 9:15 at the Chinese Multiplex, and it seemed hard to believe there wouldn’t be a significant line to see The Duke.

I then opted to walk down to the Egyptian for “On The Town.”

3) When taking a cab in L.A., be ready to help the driver navigate.

Last night, after “On The Town” (more on that later), I was ready to head back to my hotel, in Burbank. I went to a taxi stand outside the Dolby Theater and told the driver my destination. He asked for the actual address, which I gave him. He then tried to look for it on his GPS, but got some error message saying “not found.” I verified on my phone that the address I gave him was correct. He still couldn’t get anything. So I had to try to remember what I knew of the route…Highland Blvd. to Olive…Olive to First St..etc. And we got there.

– David B. Wilkerson

 

Enhanced by Zemanta